Mechanotherapy
There are multiple ways to proceed with the traction of an impacted canine after its ligation and all impacted teeth cannot be pulled in the same way. Often, one, two, even three traction techniques are combined. Therefore, here I present three of my favorite methods among several others that I was able to use in my career to bring an impacted canine in occlusion.
Traction with fixed appliances and auxiliary wire
The series of occlusal view pictures of the maxillary arch shows the evolution of the traction of 2 impacted canines.
On picture A, taken 7 days after the exposure and surgical ligation, you observe that an auxiliary wire is inserted in the auxiliary tube located on the SPEED™ brackets. This auxiliary wire (blue arrow) is engaged into loops of the ligature wire which comes out of transmucosal openings.
The bend in the auxiliary wire indicates the amount of activation required to initiate the eruption movement of the impacted tooth. The wire used is a nickel-titanium shape-memory alloy. When it is activated in that manner, the nickel-titanium wire tries to go back to its original shape, which corresponds to the main arch. Since this auxiliary wire is attached to the ligature of the canine, it thus drags the canine with it while going back to its original shape. The wire is reactivated every 6 to 8 weeks by shortening the twisted wire of the canine ligature.
On picture B, 14.4 weeks after the traction was initiated, we observe that the left canine is visible. During the surgery, the cleat had been bonded to the lingual surface, because this is often the surface that is accessible surgically. Traction from the lingual surface makes the tooth rotate. A cleat was bonded to the buccal surface and a ligature wire is attached to it and connects the tooth to the auxiliary wire. Traction from the buccal cleat will make the tooth rotate on the opposite side and will allow the bonding of a bracket on the buccal surface.
The right canine was more deeply and mesially impacted. The white arrows indicate that the tip of the canine goes beyond half of the root of the right central incisor while the left canine is barely aligned with the root of the left central incisor. The right canine will require 13 more weeks before it is visible in the mouth.
It was possible to bond brackets on the buccal surface of the upper canines (13 and 23) thirty-four (34) weeks after the traction of the canines was initiated. Picture C shows the evolution at 41 weeks. The left canine is engaged in the main arch while the right canine is engaged in an auxiliary arch. The treatment continued and other problems not related to impacted canines were corrected. Picture D shows the final result.
Traction with removable appliance followed by fixed appliances
A removable appliance has more benefits during the traction of an impacted canine. It offers an excellent anchorage and an excellent resistance to reciprocal effects of forces necessary to move the canines.
Picture B: The palatal arch of the removable appliance is rigid. Double helix springs make it possible to apply a relatively constant force for the deflection necessary to the engagement in the twisted ligature wire. The cantilever armspring is pre-activated based on the direction indicated by the dotted blue line. The cantilever is activated by engaging it into the loop of the twisted wire. The impacted tooth is thus subjected to the force of the cantilever which tends to return to its original position.
Picture C: The loop of the twisted wire is shortened, which reactivates the force of the spring.
Picture D: Eleven weeks after the installation of the removable appliance, brackets are bonded to the canines and an alignment wire is inserted.
Traction of an impacted canine in vestibular position with removable appliance followed by fixed appliances
The following example shows the treatment of a patient having three (3) impacted canines.
•1: upper right canine over the lateral incisor (transposition).
•2: upper left canine in horizontal position right under the left nostril.
•3: lower right canine over the root of the left lateral incisor.
The canines were ligated following a surgical closed flap exposure. We saw that Dr Vanarsdall recommends an open exposure instead, but let’s say that this closed eruption approach is frequently used in Quebec City.
On picture A, we can see by transparency in the red circle of the image on the left the ligature cleat bonded to the canine. Elastics are positioned on the removable appliances and in the loops of the twisted wire to bring the force vector backward to straighten up and push back the impacted teeth.
On picture B, the cleat of the canine is exposed through the gingiva. The loops are engaged into the cantilevers for a more vertical traction. The right canine erupted in the mouth 2 months into the treatment. The mandibular traction is made possible by the elastic.
On picture C (D), the cantilever is bonded directly to the cleat of the right canine. On the left, traction continues with an elastic and the cantilever.
On picture D (E), the left canine erupted through the gingiva. We notice a band of keratinized gingiva at the back of the cleat. On the left, a large pad of keratinized gingiva is visible at the neck of the canine.
The evolution of the eruption of the canines during the subsequent major treatment shows a wide band of keratinized gingiva at the neck of the permanent canines (green arrows). The lower canine which we can see the cleat by transparency through the gingiva presents an adequate gingival festoon once the eruption is completed.
Traction with fixed appliances and cantilever arch
Here is the evolution of the traction treatment of the 2 palatal canines for which the surgical approach was described on the page on the surgical exposure technique of palatally impacted canine.
At 2 weeks post surgery (picture A), the twisted ligatures are activated by NiTi cantilever springs (shape-memory alloy: Sentalloy Uprighting Springs GAC # 02-000-00 and 02-000-01). Another example of use of cantilever is shown on the page on treated case/Classe II division 2.
At 12 weeks (picture B), the left canine is already visible in the mouth. The right canine (black arrow) is submerged by the keratinized palatal tissue. The forward traction of the cantilever drags the crown of the impacted tooth toward the root of the lateral incisor on one side and the thickness of the very firm keratinized tissue can slow down the movement. A wider opening in the flap would have been preferable and would have allowed a less blindly traction.
At 24 weeks (picture C), an elastic chain is engaged in the loop of the ligature to pull the tooth laterally and backward. The cleat bonded to the buccal surface of the left canine is now exposed in the mouth and an elastic chain is attached to it. This chain allows a posterior traction on an anchor point located on the buccal surface of the canine. Yet, the buccal surface is turned too much forward. The force will rotate the tooth outward and will move it away from the lateral incisor.
At 31 weeks (picture D), a bracket is bonded to the buccal surface of the left canine and an auxiliary wire is engaged. On the right, the loop of the twisted wire is engaged in the main arch. The impacted tooth is now palpable under the labial mucosa.
At 38 weeks (picture E), the left canine is well aligned and the bracket is engaged in the main archwire. A new ligature connects the canine to the main archwire to pull the tooth closer to the buccal side and make the tooth accessible to bond a bracket.
At 41 weeks (picture F), it is finally possible to bond a bracket and engage an auxiliary wire.
At 47 weeks post surgery, the bracket of the right canine is repositioned. We notice the same type of rotation toward the mesial (front) surface of the crown. We will need to rebond the bracket at least once more to obtain an optimal position of the bracket on the tooth. The left canine presents an adequate position in the arch.
very good page
Thanks
Hello.when you have a palatal lateral incisor and you start traction,how do you achieve bodily movement on order to prevent the root to be more palatal and the crown so proclined?or you only correct at the end of the traction with rectangular wire? Thank you
Root movement is done after the canine if bring into the arch. It is done with full dimensional rectangluar wire and brackt. A torquing spring is often need.
However, in you question, you mention the lateral incisor. The same mechanics aplly.
Please just may I know
Only for the removable appliance design that can solve the maxillary right permanent canine
But,with maxillary left permanent canine is fully erupted into the arch.
Just for one and please why do you chose these ?
If there is only one impacted canine I use the same appliance design, but with one cantilever spring.
I found an exemple of left impacted canine and a right fully erupted canine that is under treatment actually. It represent the mirror view of your case.
Here is the radiographic view of a deep palatally impacted left canine in a young adult.
The radiographic view show the direction of the force applied to the palatally impacted canine.
The advantage of a removable appliance is maximal anchorage and minimal side effect on neighboring teeth.
Once the canine is visible into the mouth, fixed applaince is used to pull and place the canine into the arch and align in the 3 planes of space.
I hope this answer your question.
Best regards
.
I just found your website! Which is astonishing, since I’ve been delving into impacted canines now for 2 years and have created a website
for the benefit of other parents and to document my son’s case.
We live in the San Franciso Bay Area, but went to Jerusalem in March to see Dr. Adrian Becker and have my son’s canines exposed for a third time. My son’s canines happen to also be afflicted with PEIR (preeruptive intracoronal invasive resorption), even Dr. Becker has never seen a similar case. I have posted his thoughts, hypothesis and his handling of my son’s case on the website if you are interested.
I have found that it is a very painful process to try to educate yourself as a parent to be able to find the right option for your child. A resource like your website though is a true godsend and I thank you on behalf of all parents in this position.
Thank you for your kind remarks.
I was able to log the link you provided me. I agree that your son have a rare issue of external resorption at the tip of the crown (cuspid tip). The case of your son is very particular.The prognosis is not very good.
Hi again, my son’s lower canine emerged immediately after the PEIR was mended with glassionomer. #6 didn’t move, so we tried apicotomy of the dilacerated root(according to what Dr Edela Puricelli in Brazil recommends in her work concerning the ‘inverted Y of Ennis’). Traction was delayed for 2 weeks because the orthodontist and surgeon didn’t communicate, and the tooth didn’t move.
Faced with either an implant at 17, that might get submerged, or living with a retainer for several years, I’ve researched auto transplantation which seems to be quite a succesfull solution in Europe, India, Australia… but isn’t practiced a lot/at all in the US, I was wondering if you have any experience about it, or if it is in clinical practice in Canada.
(Would motivate us sending Sam to University of British Columbia which we visited this summer, very nice.)
I went back to the cephalogram on your website of your son’s treatment and found the ceph taken on july 15, 2014. I wounder why nobody sugestted an alternate treatment plan that would have involve extraction of the ankylose canine and 3 premolars.
It is quite clear from the tracing that maxillary incisors are proclined by 5° (mx1-SN = 109,4°; norms 104°), lower incisors are proclined by 14° (IMPA = 104°; norm = 90°) and interincisal angle is decreased by 15° (1/1 = 115°; norm 130°).
Extraction of the ankylosed canine and 3 premolars would have help to reduce the dentoalveolar protrusion and achieve normal class I occlusion without the burden of waitng the right age to get an implant in a cosmetic zone where it will always be a challenge to have smile esthetics.
I doubt that an autogenous transplantation would be a viable option.
I would like show you this exemple where the patient was told that the canine might be ankylosed and that extraction of 3 premolars was the best option.
My concern is that your son is into orthodontic treatment for so long and closing the space os canine and premolar extraction means 12 to 18 more months of treatment. It is sad that nobody has thought about an alternate treatment plan earlier.
Dear Dr Sylvain,
I am a brazilian orthodontist. I was in Internet looking for some data about traction of impacted teeth when I found your site.
I really like the mechanics, but I am very surprised with the quality of photos. I am trying to make my intra-oral photos always in the same pattern in but I think it is very, very dificult. How can you achieve the exactely same position in lateral intra-oral photos that are made in different moments of time? There are something to help? Is it only with eyes?
Thank you a lot.
Margarida
Thank you for your comments about the photos.
I humbly admit that most pictures receives some photoshop editing before publication like cropping, adjusting the angle of view, and some sharpening. But to get those nice edited photos, i need good raw materials.
I will list the armamentarium.
First and foremost, you need a good camera set-up. I use a Nikon D3200. The lens is an AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105 f2,8G IE-ED. The flash is a R1C1 Wireless Close-Up Speedlight System.
Secondo, you need a good set of retractors and mirrors. You can find buy it from Ortho-Pli Corporation.
You will need:
1-Double ended cheek retractor #0118-D.
2- Lip retractor #0118-LRH with handle (the one indicated by the black arrow).
3- An intra-oral side view and occlusal view angled mirror #PM3R-3. This one will fit for most patients. For very young patients there are smaller mirrors.
The field of view is 65 to 70 mm for frontal, left and right view. For occlusal view a field of 80 mm or so is necessary.
Prise de photo intrabuccale
If you click on the videoclip link above you will see me in action. Note that i did not took intra-oral mirrors for this patient, but this is an exception. Normally, there is an intraoral mirror and I shoot the picture in the mirror. The flash is rotated and adjusted. For frontal intra-oral view, the flash is at 12h00. For left intra-oral view, the flash is facing the mirror at 15h00; for right intraoral, the flash is placed at 09h00. For upper occlusal view, the mirror is looking up and the flash is at 06h00. For lower occlusal view, the mirror is looking down and the flash is at 12h00.
I hope this will help you to obtain good pictures.
Best regards
Dr Sylvain Chamberland.